SB 2369 · 2026 Regular Session
Win $2,000 at a casino while owing child support, and the state takes what you owe
Casinos must check big winners against a state list of parents behind on child support and send the money they owe to the state before paying them.
- In effect since
- The Gaming Commission and the Department of Human Services have until Jan. 1, 2027 to build the system.
- How it became law
- Signed by the governor
By Jackson Wire Staff · October 9, 2026
What it does
The Department of Human Services, or MDHS, will send casinos a daily list of parents who owe back child support. The check applies to a win of $2,000 or more at a slot machine or a sportsbook, Bradley and SuperTalk reported; WLOX put it at more than $2,000. The bill summary the Wire read says the rule covers winnings that require a federal tax form. If the winner is on the list, the casino withholds what is owed, sends it to MDHS within seven days and pays out whatever is left; card and table games such as poker and craps are exempt, SuperTalk reported.
MDHS holds the money for 30 days. The parent can ask for a hearing in that window, but only about a mistaken identity or a wrong amount, not about the support order itself. Casinos may keep a fee of up to $35 per payment, starting with the second payment for annuities, slot jackpots paid in installments, and cannot be sued for following the list, according to the bill summary.
Why it happened
About 170,000 of Mississippi’s roughly 200,000 child support cases have an arrearage, meaning someone is behind, according to MDHS figures reported by WLOX. Federal data show Mississippi collected 53% of court-ordered child support in 2024, against a 65% national rate, DeSoto County News reported. Senate Gaming Chairman David Blount, a Jackson Democrat, cited state data showing 153,964 children are owed $1.7 billion in past-due support.
MDHS had pushed for the policy for four years, spokesperson Mark Jones said, according to DeSoto County News. Louisiana’s version intercepted an average of nearly $1 million a year in its first nine years, the National Child Support Engagement Association reported, according to the same story.
What's behind it
Similar bills had failed in past sessions, SuperTalk reported. This time Sen. Walter Michel, a Ridgeland Republican, wrote the bill; the House passed it 92 to 22 in early March and Gov. Tate Reeves signed it March 19, according to DeSoto County News and the bill history. The Wire could not find who cast the 22 no votes or why.
Michel said the bill aims mainly at slot payouts reported to the IRS, chiefly wins over $2,000, and explicitly covers slot annuities and sports bets, DeSoto County News reported. MDHS thanked the Gaming Commission, the attorney general and the gaming industry for collaborating on the bill, Jones said.
What it costs, and who pays
The Wire could not find an official estimate of how much the state expects to collect; Louisiana’s program averaged nearly $1 million a year, the National Child Support Engagement Association reported. The bill summary allows casinos a fee of up to $35 per payment, and the Wire could not tell from the summary whether the fee comes out of the winner’s money or the state’s. Someone who owes more than the jackpot gets nothing.
The Wire’s read: the state’s cost is building the daily list and the hearing process at MDHS, both due by Jan. 1, 2027.
What changes for you
If you owe back child support and hit a $2,000 jackpot, the casino must withhold what you owe and send it to the state. If you are owed support, the money arrives after a 30-day hold unless the other parent asks for a hearing.
The Wire’s read: everyday play is not affected, because the rules cover only wins large enough for a tax form, and casinos do not have to re-check the same person for 24 hours.
Watch for
Jan. 1, 2027: the deadline for the Gaming Commission and MDHS to have the list, the fees and the hearing process in place. The Wire’s read: until then the law is on the books but the system to run it may not be fully running.
The first annual numbers from MDHS on how much was intercepted.